A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

5.  Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation of your case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led into the recovery of sleeping tablets on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore is developed before the Court wherein the sleeping capsules were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver although not during the belly. As a result, the recovery of reported sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for the complainant have also argued that during the investigation on the case the petitioner Bhoora led into the recovery of a motorcycle.

The main target is over the intention to cause injury. This is usually a major trouble: a very very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it correct towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

Law professors traditionally have played a much lesser role in establishing case law in common legislation than professors in civil law. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[4] and never formally amenable to establishing precedent, much of the exposition on the law in civil legislation traditions is done by teachers rather than by judges; this is called doctrine and should be published in treatises or in journals such as Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common legislation courts relied little on legal scholarship; Consequently, in the turn on the twentieth century, it absolutely was really exceptional to determine an academic writer quoted inside a legal decision (other than Potentially for your educational writings of popular judges such as Coke and Blackstone).

forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more

Accessing free case regulation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any one seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.

During the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. click here Lessen courts over the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related into the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each state has its have judicial system that features trial and appellate courts. The highest court in each state is commonly referred to as being the “supreme” court, Even though there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, While state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment of your state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.

3. Rule of Law: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of law and making sure that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to improving the effectiveness of your law in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.

fourteen. Inside the light with the position explained over, it can be concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more